I will let the pros debate today's speech in Cairo ...However lets take just 1 point...
Nukes Are OK For Iran, But Not For Us?
If Iran has "legitimate energy concerns" that make its nuclear plants OK, doesn't the energy-starved U.S.? Why doesn't Iran, with the second-largest proven oil reserves, just build some refineries?
Normally, a nation with significant oil resources that decides to develop nuclear power would and should be praised for its prudence. Nuclear power is an emission-free domestic form of energy that is good for the environment and the economy.
Except when it's a country that builds missiles instead of refineries and pledges to wipe a neighbor off the face of the earth.
They need NUKE Power? Hell all they have to do is punch a few holes in the ground and build a couple 3 refineries. They don't have to deal with all the piss ants that stop production like we do here. In 1/2 a dozen years they would be the richest country in the mid- east.
They need Nuke so they can blow Israel off the map. How bright do you have to be to know that?
We gonna wait till we have 6 million dead Jews? Isn't that what the world did in the late 30's early 40's?
Now lets take that sentence from the "Investors" article...
"Nuclear power is an emission-free domestic form of energy that is good for the environment and the economy."
Again why would it be ok for Iran but not America " It is good for the "Environment" and the "Economy" Somebody explain to me how this could be good for Iran and not good for America